🪶 The Ralls Family Migration: From Tennessee to Arkansas and Missouri, 1840–1850

By David A. Ralls, Genetic Genealogy GuidePost (http://www.rallsdna.com)


📜 Research Objective

This study sought to determine when and how the children of Willis Ralls—namely William B., Nathaniel, and Charles M. Ralls, along with daughter Sarah (Ralls) Cook—left Obion County, Tennessee, and where they ultimately settled by 1850. The analysis also investigates the migration motives, travel companions (FANs), and historical context of their journey westward.


🧭 Historical Setting

In the decades following the Jackson Purchase of 1818, settlement expanded rapidly across western Tennessee. This land deal—negotiated by Andrew Jackson and Isaac Shelby—opened vast tracts between the Mississippi, Ohio, and Tennessee Rivers to non-Indigenous settlers.
Willis Ralls, a chain carrier for surveyor William Owen in early Hopkins County, Kentucky, was among those who migrated southward into this new frontier.


👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 The Ralls and Cook Families in 1840

By 1840, census and tax evidence placed the extended Ralls family in Obion County, Tennessee:

HouseholdHead of HouseholdNotes
Willis RallsAge 60–70Patriarch; probable widower by 1849
William B. Ralls30–39Married Mary Ann “Polly” Conner
Nathaniel Ralls30–39Married Mary “Polly” Garrett
Levi Cook30–39Married Sarah Ralls
Isom Conner40–50Father of Mary Ann Conner (in-law), already in Pike Co., AR by 1840

(Table adapted from U.S. Census, Obion Co., TN, 1840.)


🚚 Migration Timeline: 1840–1850

By the 1850 census, the family had dispersed across Arkansas and Missouri. Tax and census data yield the following timeline of departures:

🧾 Table 1. Timeline of Migration Events (Simplified)

YearIndividualFrom → ToKey Record or Event
1839–1841Isom Conner Jr.Obion Co., TN → Pike Co., AREarly Arkansas tax rolls
1842–1843William B. RallsObion Co., TN → Sevier Co., ARDaughter Elizabeth born in AR by 1843
1842–1843Nathaniel RallsObion Co., TN → Carroll Co., KY → Sevier Co., ARDaughter Harriett born KY, then AR
1844Levi CookObion Co., TN → Stoddard Co., MOAppears in MO by 1850
1849Charles M. RallsObion Co., TN → Sevier Co., AROn 1849 Sevier Co. tax roll

📈 Chart 1. Ralls Family Migration by Year (1839–1850)

1839 | Conner → Pike Co., AR
1842 | William → Sevier Co., AR
1843 | Nathaniel → KY then AR
1844 | Cook → MO
1849 | Charles → AR
1850 | Families established in AR & MO


🌽 The Arkansas Years

By 1850, William B., Nathaniel, and Charles Ralls lived as neighboring farmers in Madison Township, Sevier County, Arkansas, suggesting they migrated together or followed closely. Their father-in-law, Isom Conner, also resided nearby.
Meanwhile, Sarah (Ralls) Cook and Levi Cook had settled farther north in Stoddard County, Missouri.


⚖️ Socioeconomic Context

Several factors likely influenced the migration:

  • New opportunities for cheap land after Arkansas statehood (1836).
  • The decline of small farming viability in western Tennessee by the 1840s.
  • The family network linking the Ralls, Conner, and Cook families provided safety and familiarity during relocation.

The timing—1842–1844—aligns with regional westward trends and early settlement waves into southwest Arkansas and Missouri.


🧬 Genealogical Synthesis

Family LineMigration PatternConfirmed By
William B. RallsTN → ARCensus, tax rolls, birthplaces of children
Nathaniel RallsTN → KY → ARCensus, pension affidavit, children’s birthplaces
Charles M. RallsTN → ARTax rolls, census
Sarah (Ralls) CookTN → MOCensus, tax rolls
Isom Conner Jr. (in-law)TN → ARTax records, census

🧩 These coordinated migrations demonstrate a FAN (Friends, Associates, Neighbors) network centered on kinship—particularly the Conner family connection.


🪔 Conclusion

The children of Willis Ralls departed Obion County, Tennessee between 1842 and 1844, joining the westward movement into Arkansas and Missouri. Their migration was likely influenced by family ties, land availability, and the economic promise of frontier settlements.
By 1850, three Ralls brothers were established in Sevier County, Arkansas, while Sarah and Levi Cook had built their home in Stoddard County, Missouri. Willis himself remained behind, passing away in Obion County before 1850.


🔍 Future Research Suggestions

  • Local history study of Obion County, TN, for events prompting migration.
  • Land and probate searches in Carroll County, KY (Nathaniel’s interim residence).
  • Stoddard County, MO archives for Cook family documentation.
  • FAN analysis of neighboring Obion County households for potential kinship ties.

Citation

David A. Ralls, “Migration to Arkansas,” a working file last updated 21 November 2024.

Were Willis Ralls and Larkin Rolls Brothers? A Genealogical Investigation.

By David A. Ralls, 18 November 2023
www.rallsdna.com


Objective

This study investigates whether Willis Ralls (b. c.1780–81, d. 1849, Obion County, Tennessee) and Larkin Rolls (b. c.1766–1784) were brothers. Both appeared on the 1810 U.S. Census in Hopkins County, Kentucky, suggesting a close familial or migratory connection.


Historical Context

By 1806, Willis Ralls had arrived in Hopkins County, Kentucky, from South Carolina. His associations with William Owen and surveying records show he was an active settler near Owens Creek, an area later part of Webster County.

Larkin Rolls also lived nearby — in the Clear Creek/Lick Creek area — alongside families from Chester County, South Carolina, such as the Conners, Wades, and Chapels. These shared origins provide the foundation for a FAN (Friends, Associates, Neighbors) network linking Willis and Larkin.


Establishing Identity: Willis Ralls

Census YearBirth Range (Implied)Residence
18101766–1784Hopkins Co., KY
18201776–1794Livingston Co., KY
18301781–1790Obion Co., TN
18401771–1780Obion Co., TN

Estimated Birth: 1780–1781
Migration Path: South Carolina → Kentucky (1806) → Tennessee (by 1824)

He married Priscilla [—?—], likely between 1794–1799, and had several children including William B. Ralls (b. 1803) and Sarah Ralls (b. 1805), both born in South Carolina.

Court minutes from January 1850 show that Willis died in late 1849 as a pauper in Obion County, with entries noting his coffin and burial expenses — confirming his final residence.


Establishing Identity: Larkin Rolls

Larkin appears only once, in the 1810 Hopkins County Census, with a household suggesting a birth before 1779. His land area neighbors included Isham Conner Jr. and Zacharias Wade — again tying him to the Chester County, SC migration group.

However, no tax, court, or probate records directly connect Larkin to Willis after 1810. The supposed “L. Rolles” land entry in court records was later proven to be Lawrence Rolleson, Sr., showing how transcription errors can distort genealogical conclusions.


FAN Analysis: Shared Communities

A FAN club (Friends, Associates, Neighbors) analysis shows overlap between Willis’s and Larkin’s associates:

Family / AssociateConnectionEvidence
Isham Conner Sr. & Jr.Neighbors of Larkin; father-in-law of Willis’s sonCensus, Marriage, Wills
Zacharias WadeNeighbor; from Chester Co., SCCensus
Rev. John ChapelMarried Jesse Cook & Susannah Rolls (1815)Marriage Record
William OwenLand partner of WillisSurvey Records

Records Searched

Record TypeResultNotes
ProbateNegativeNo estate for Larkin
MarriageOne match – Susannah Ralls (1815)Likely Willis’s daughter
Military (War of 1812)Negative for LarkinSeveral unrelated Ralls/Rolls
Census 1820–1830NegativePossible match in Arkansas (Larkin “Ruolls”)

Conclusion

While no direct documentary evidence yet proves that Willis Ralls and Larkin Rolls were brothers, their shared geography, associates, and origins in South Carolina suggest a plausible kinship link.
Future research should explore:

  1. South Carolina origins — particularly Chester County records.
  2. Marriage bonds in Hopkins County that may survive outside digitized collections.
  3. The identity of Larkin Ruolls (Arkansas, 1830 Census) as a possible son.
  4. DNA matches among Ralls and Rolls descendants to test shared paternal lines.

Final Thoughts

Genealogical research often advances not through proof, but through eliminating errors, such as the misattributed “L. Rolles” record. By combining document analysis, community reconstruction, and DNA testing, the mystery of Willis and Larkin’s relationship may eventually be solved.

“Research not shared does not further our common goal of learning about our ancestors.”
David A. Ralls


Citation

David A. Ralls, “Willis Ralls and Larkin Rolls – are they brothers?,” a working file last updated 18 November 2023.

Unraveling the Early Jernigan Lineages with Y-DNA Evidence


🧬 Introduction: Redefining the Jernigan Legacy

For decades, genealogists have wrestled with one question: How are Thomas Jernigan (the immigrant), John “Meherrin Creek” Jernigan, and Henry Jernigan, Sr. related?
Through traditional sources and cutting-edge Y-DNA testing, a fresh, data-supported model that clarifies early Jernigan lineages and bridges centuries of genealogical uncertainty.

“Research not shared does not further our common goal of learning about our ancestors.”David A. Ralls


🕰️ 1. The Traditional Puzzle of the Jernigan Patriarchs

Three patriarchs stand at the foundation of every Jernigan line in America:

  • Thomas “the Immigrant” (arrived 1635–1637)
  • John “Meherrin Creek” (m. Temperance Moore)
  • Henry Jernigan, Sr. (m. Phebe Blackman)

The main point of contention? Whether John and Henry were sons or grandsons of Thomas the Immigrant.

ResearcherGeneration of John “Meherrin Creek”Relationship to Thomas (Immigrant)
Lillian Worley3rdGrandson
Marion Hargrove2ndSon
Richard Jernigan2ndSon
David A. Ralls (new evidence)3rdGrandson

🟨 Sidebar: Why it matters — Generational misalignment affects thousands of Jernigan descendants tracing heritage through early Virginia and North Carolina.


⚓ 2. Colonial Realities in Context

Seventeenth-century Chesapeake life was unforgiving. Nearly half of settlers died before 20, and few reached 50. Given this, Thomas “the Immigrant”, born around 1618, could not have been the same man in 1668 land records. Those documents instead fit Thomas “the Elder” Jernigan, his son.

📊 Figure 1. Colonial Survival Rates

Age 0–20  ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 50% mortality
Age 20–40 ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 70% mortality
Age 40–60 ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 85% mortality

Illustration of the steep demographic decline in 1600s Virginia and Maryland.


🧬 3. The Genetic Breakthrough

The Jernigan Y-DNA Project—spanning nearly 100 male testers—revealed decisive evidence.

Key Findings:

  • All Jernigan’s share haplogroup R-BY27673, dating ~1527 CE with a 95 % probability he was born between 1406 – 1624 CE .
  • Descendant SNP branches: R-FTB59419, R-FTT57, and R-FTT56 (this analysis only deals with SNPs R-FTT57 and R-FTT56) .
LineSNPStatusInterpretation
John “Meherrin Creek”R-FTT56✅ PositiveRelated to Thomas (Sarah Mulford)
Thomas (Sarah Mulford)R-FTT56✅ PositiveRelated to John “Meherrin Creek”
Henry (Phebe Blackman)R-FTT56
R-FTT57
✅ Negative
✅ Positive
Separate branch

📈 Figure 2. Y-DNA Branching of Early Jernigan’s

R-BY27673
├── R-FTT56 → Thomas & John lines
└── R-FTT57 → Henry line

🧩 Interpretation: John and Thomas share a common ancestor after Thomas the Immigrant—confirming an intermediate generation.


📜 4. Revised Genealogical Model

Ralls proposes inserting Thomas “the Elder” Jernigan (bef. 1647 – aft. 1704) as the son of Thomas the Immigrant and the father of both Thomas (m. Sarah Mulford) and John “Meherrin Creek.”

🧾 Generational Chart

Thomas "the Immigrant" Jernigan (b. ca. 1618)
├── Thomas "the Elder" Jernigan (bef. 1647 – aft. 1704)
│   ├── Thomas Jernigan (m. Sarah Mulford)
│   └── John “Meherrin Creek” Jernigan (m. Temperance Moore)
└── Henry “the Elder” Jernigan (bef. 1655 – aft. 1735)
    └── Henry Jernigan, Sr. (m. Phebe Blackman)

🎯 Impact: This adjustment aligns genetic, documentary, and chronological evidence into a cohesive framework.


📚 5. Reconciling Historical Records

Many earlier works—particularly Lillian Worley’s Jernigan Reunion (1999)—misattributed a 1668 land grant to the immigrant rather than his son. This is corrected by integrating:

  • Land deeds and tax records
  • Virginia and Maryland colonial rolls
  • Y-DNA clade data

💡 Takeaway: Documentary ambiguity, once unresolvable, can now be clarified through genetic triangulation.


🧠 6. Lessons for Genealogists

The Jernigan study illustrates a new era in genealogy:

  • Collaboration: Nearly 100 participants shared DNA and records.
  • Critical re-evaluation: Longstanding assumptions are revisited.
  • Scientific validation: Genetic data supports documentary reasoning.

“The realignment strengthens the Jernigan genealogical framework and underscores the transformative role of Y-DNA in historical research.”


🪶 7. Conclusion

The realignment proposed by David A. Ralls reshapes the foundational Jernigan tree, confirming that:

  • Thomas (Sarah Mulford) and John (Temperance Moore) are brothers, grandsons of the immigrant.
  • Henry (Phebe Blackman) descends from a collateral line.

Together, these findings merge 17th-century history with 21st-century genetics—a model for future family history breakthroughs.


📚 Citation

David A. Ralls, A Case for Realignment of the Early Jernigan Generations,” Working File, last updated 24 October 2025.